Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Module 1: The Next Generation of Distance Learning

The three articles posted by Moller, Foshay, Huett, Coleman (2008) stated that e-learning needs to continue to grow and develop in the different levels of learning (corporate, K-12, and higher education).  Simonson's view on distance education is "formal education in which the learning group (teacher, students, and resources) are separated by geography and sometimes time." (Laureate Education, Inc. 2010) 

Moller, Foshay, Huett, & Coleman and Simonson have some views in common such as economic factors which plays a huge part in the growth of e-learning.  All authors are in agreement that e-learning is comprised to distance teaching and distance learning.  E-learning is more convenient for the public and/ or private corporate and educational sectors because it is available on demand, cost effective and is very much hands on in developed and developing countries.

Problems for educators and e-learners can arise from the lack of qualified distance education educators.  Distance education is at a rapid rate of growth (Simons, n.d), but the general public and some of the administrators in the educational and corporate field do not understand the importance of contrasting between face-to-face education and distance education.

In my opinion, not all educators can teach a distance education just like every student will not succeed in e-learning classes.  Educators and students must understand that e-learning and distance education does not go hand in hand.  Distance education has not been widely known because for a while I did not want to be sitting in a classroom but when I found out about distance education I came aboard.

References:
Laureate Education, Inc. (2010). Distance Education

Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008, May/June).  The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 1: Training and development). Tech Trends, 52(3), 70-75. 

Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008, May/June).  The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 2: Higher Education). Tech Trends, 52(4), 66-70. 

Huett, J., Moller, L., Foshay, W., & Coleman, C. (2008, September/October).  The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional design on the potential of the web (Part 3: K12). Tech Trends, 52(5), 63-67. 

2 comments:

  1. I agree with you about the fact that not all teachers can teach in the distance education environment. I didn't realize how big a difference there was between teaching a distance education class and teaching in a face-to-face classroom. Moller, Foshay, & Huett (2008), in part 2 of their article, go into great depth and detail when talking about the additional, and extensive, planning and training that teachers must have in order to become successful teachers in the electronic environment. It is surprising to me that school districts do not recognize this, and provide training to transition interested teachers into these teaching positions. What do you think?

    ReplyDelete